10.13.2010 03:00 PM
GAO Deems National Broadband Plan Implementation ‘Challenging’
WASHINGTON: The Government Accountability Office’s
assessment of the National Broadband Plan is one of skepticism. The GAO looked
at broadband deployment policies across seven developed nations in its analysis
of the Plan proffered in March by the Federal Communications Commission.
“While the United States plans to take actions similar to those of other
leading countries to achieve the National Broadband Plan’s goals of universal
access and increased adoption, achieving these goals will be challenging,” the
GAO report said. “Actions will be required by governments at all levels and
the private sector. Furthermore, implementing the plan’s recommendations will
require coordinating the work of multiple stakeholders and obtaining sufficient
funding, among other actions. How effectively federal agencies will be able to
address these challenges and implement the plan’s recommendations, as well as
what the private sector will do to further deployment, use and adoption,
remains to be seen.”
The GAO report was requested by Reps. Henry Waxman (D.-Calif.), chairman of the
House Energy and Commerce Committee, and Rick Boucher (D.-Va.) chairman of the
Communications, Technology and Internet Subcommittee. The lawmakers released
the report this week.
The GAO report analyzed broadband availability across 27 developed countries,
including the United States, and found a 90 percent household deployment rate,
“regardless of demographic or geographic differences,” it said. Average
download speeds were said to range from 1.352 Mbps in Mexico to 11.717 in South
Korea. The United States ranks 14th at 3.8 Mbps reported, (though the NBP
actual average download
speed is 3.1 Mbps).
The GAO said several factors affected adoption rates, including cost and
computer ownership. The average megabit-per-second price in the United States
was $8.06, compared to the 27-country average of $8.75. The cost of all but the
fastest speed tier was lower in the U.S. than on average.
The monthly price for the “low-speed,” 256 kbps - 1.9 Mbps access was $23.74 in
the United States versus $30.23 on average. For 2 -11.9 Mbps, the U.S. price
was $36.90 compared to $41.94. For 12 - 32 Mbps, the U.S. price was $60.13
versus $67.43. For “very high-speed” access greater than 35 Mbps, the U.S.
price escalated to $122.45 compared to $72.85.
U.S. adoption rates were starkly divided by household income. Ninety-one
percent of households with annual incomes of more than $75,000 had broadband.
Only 40 percent of those with incomes less than $20,000 had service. Over all, 65 percent of Americans have broadband Internet access. The ratio
drops to 50 percent for rural residents. The adoption rate is 35 percent for
Americans 65 and older, and 24 percent for high school drop-outs.
With regard to personal computer ownership, the United States ranks fifth, the
GAO said. Nearly 81 of 100 people here have computers, compared to just over 52
The United States did take the top ranking in one area. The GAO found that the
United States had the most subscribers of any of the 27 developed nations, with
81 million. Japan was No. 2 with just 31 million.
The seven countries that implemented broadband policies included Canada,
France, Japan, the Netherlands, South Korea, Sweden and the United Kingdom. The
GAO said all shared similar elements of planning, funding, promoting
competition and providing consumer usefulness, training and subsidies. That list was
not precisely in line with the FCC’s Plan, but “the areas and the types of
actions overlap and represent similar approaches to expanding broadband
deployment and adoption.” the GAO said.
Boucher and Waxman both took the GAO analysis to be an affirmation of the FCC’s
“I am encouraged that the FCC’s National Broadband Plan recommendations are
consistent with proven initiatives and policies utilized by other countries
that, like the United States, strive to be leaders in broadband deployment and
usage,” Waxman said in a statement. “GAO’s report confirms once again the
importance of the National Broadband Plan.”
Boucher suggested rerouting Universal Service Funds to support the plan. “One
important tool for making ubiquitous broadband a reality is promptly adopting
legislation to update the Universal Service Fund to allow its use by
communications providers for broadband deployment and adoption,” he said.
“National Broadband Plan Reflects the Experiences of Leading Countries, but
Implementation Will Be Challenging,” is available
-- Deborah D. McAdams