03.03.2011 11:00 AM
Sinclair Cut Retrans Agreement Hours Before FCC Reconsiders Rules
HUNT VALLEY, MD., and PHILADELPHIA: Sinclair announced a retransmission agreement-in-principle this morning with Comcast, just as federal regulators prepare to reconsider its rules governing the scheme.

Sinclair recently closed out retrans deals for 28 stations carried by Time Warner Cable; and for six stations served by Bright House. The Time Warner negotiations grew strident and extended nearly four weeks after the previous contract expired, though no stations were pulled from cable systems. The deal with Comcast covers 36 TV stations in 22 markets for an unspecified number of years. It was achieved quietly.

Wells Fargo analyst Marci Ryvicker estimated the Comcast deal covers around 5.2 million of the provider’s roughly 24 million subscribing households. She said it “likely represents $2 million to $3 million more in retrans” revenues.

“We were happy to see that SBGI and CMCSA were able to reach an agreement without a public argument,” Ryvicker said, using the ticker symbols for Sinclair and Comcast. “This gives us hope that SBGI’s other major contract coming due later this year--Cox in H1--will also be completed in a timely manner.”

Retransmission negotiations are a phenomena of HDTV. When cable operators started charging a premium for hi-def tiers, broadcasters, providing a majority of those signals at the time, wanted a piece of the revenue. Disney’s ABC and Time Warner Cable affected the first high-profile retrans stand-off more than a decade ago, with ABC pulling “Who Wants to Be a Millionaire” when the show was at the peak of its popularity.

Acrimonious retransmission negotiations have been playing out in the public arena since then. Lawmakers finally had enough last year after Fox stations were pulled from Cablevision systems for 15 days that included the first game of the World Series. Several urged Federal Communications Chairman Julius Genachowski to take up retransmission consent reform. FCC Media Bureau Chief Bill Lake announced the commission’s intention to do so in mid-December. The item is on today’s meeting agenda.

One of the things cable operators have most agitated for is to have the FCC prohibit broadcasters from pulling their signals during negotiations when contracts expire. The general expectation from the FCC is to let market forces take their course.

“We do not anticipate any material change to the method of negotiations,” Ryvicker said in her note.

Robert McDowell, one of two Republicans on the commission, told broadcasters earlier this week to continue negotiating and to not expect substantial intervention from the FCC. House Energy and Commerce Chairman, Fred Upton (R-Mich.) said he didn’t believe Congress should get involved, nor that the FCC should compel carriage agreements.

Deborah D. McAdams

Post New Comment
If you are already a member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are
made, please login or register.

Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)

Posted by: Deborah McAdams
Fri, 03-04-2011 08:39 AM Report Comment
Lies do not become true no matter how often you repeat them. It's simply not true that broadcast stations asked for a piece of the action when cable operators started charging more for HD broadcast signals. What a bunch of self-serving crap. Show me one single cable operator who has HD broadcast signals in a pay tier. And oh, yeah - most retrans negotiations are "concluded quietly" with no loss of signal. True. Most cable operators, when the sole, monopoly source for a major network signal holds a gun to their head, decide to say don't shoot and pay the ransom. Give me a break. There is no "market" for broadcast signals. There is legalized extortion, perpetrated by companies who get to use the public airwaves FOR FREE.
Posted by: Deborah McAdams
Fri, 03-04-2011 08:47 AM Report Comment
Another courageous anonymous comment. A majority of stations elected must-carry before cable ops initially put HD on higher-priced tiers. Because it was only available on digital tiers, which were higher priced. Retrans then became much more widespread. - McAdams

Thursday 11:07 AM
The Best Deconstruction of a 4K Shoot You'll Ever Read
With higher resolutions and larger HD screens, wide shots using very wide lenses can be a problem because they allow viewers to see that infinity doesn’t quite resolve into perfect sharpness.

Featured Articles
Discover TV Technology